personalism Trap
Applications and testimonials are institutionalized: The device was recognized and justified by the players, the Justice gave the ok and spent the words in debates on morality, ethics and democracy. So, as an inevitable fate, the 28 / 6 vote and the following Monday, we'll find out who is the alternate winner, ie foo. A name in the list that is not in the polls, has no face media but obviously, raises the flag of "our project."
The personalities in politics are a thing of the past few years in Argentina due, in part, of the legitimacy of the parties. A current attempt to erase the institutions, all the collective and what transcends the sake of the so-called efficient individualism that puts everything in proper balance, or almost everything. So the names were built under the dynamic of the show business no substance.
In recent months, with the acceleration of the election time is to put in the window to rating the most to gain or to let the others out. At least that indicate certain decisions. Undoubtedly, the legislation are a popular test for the officer and the opposition in view of the next president. You compare forces to access the main power, it is clear that nobody cares too much to pass in Congress.
On the campaign, both as Kirchnerism Macrismo speak of defending "the Project" or "Model", which everyone says wield particular. And following the plan, change figures, it now appears that the charges do not matter too much but that the party wins. Now the strange thing is that if, indeed, political forces must think long term to consolidate power, why make use of better picture candidates?
is true that taking a good picture of the galley is not easy, there is sufficient supply. And if we follow the polls, the best image and positions of power, such is the case Michetti, Scioli, mayors of the conurbation or the very front of the PJ Nestor (or is there another place of greater power?). Then the party leaders make use of personalities to defend the project or model. Sounds like a mouthful, right?
But the confusion continues because it is "testimonial" the presence of these names printed in large letters on the ballot. That is, they will not take office if they are blessed by the popular will so valued, but the attitude is the support for the party. A beautiful gesture because the campaigns are exhausting: you have to take pictures, talking to the instruments, hold it to journalism and above all, to hide what each personality unreliable. A clear example of someone uncomfortable in his nomination is former deputy chief of GCBA explaining its decision or as decisidieron.
foo appears here (no offense) who will take the bench and will have a voice in the debates of Parliament. If we are optimistic to hear some discussion on certain topics that deserve it: violence, abortion, decriminalization of drugs, tax reform and the emerging law on broadcasting. The fact is that the foo is not spoken, not even being asked. Them if they are killed because they are petty Shines on TV.
Undoubtedly, these elections are vital because they all want to win. Look at De Narvaez spent all his money on campaign before it begins to occupy a position similar to that which has not yet presented any bill as a legislator. It is interesting because all their communication planning aims position itself for governor of Buenos Aires and there remains only the sky.
Thus, we can continue with the paradoxes of the campaign ever, but this time the heart of the matter are so and so, do you know their faces?
0 comments:
Post a Comment