few days ago, the website Diariosobrediarios Revistaxrevista announced that his section would be closed to the loss of prominence in the media agenda. Paragraph was to make a score of issues, artwork, fonts and signatures that appeared in various publications. But, the media argued that the output of the section is that magazines fall into "high-sounding tapas notes that refer to general light and built with anonymous sources, explicit political listed in the column (" official "and" opposition ") and lack of information" . Undoubtedly, the list is destructive and it is worth questioning and observe what happens beyond the current weekly.
by his newspaper, magazines such as News, Twenty, Debate, among others are as distinctive value the possibility of not running behind last time to devote to his team of journalists to research and contextual analysis of phenomena social, with a strong impact on the content of other media. This characterization works on the theory and developments during the late 90's. Currently, it is hard to remember the weekly themes are installed on the media agenda. This is due to which new lower-priced weeklies as Profile (weekends) and looks to the south, while the highest recorded sale of newspapers on Sundays, with a corresponding increase in number of leaves. The media took the post of news analysis supported by qualified signatures and ensure the repetition of the agenda in the rest of the week.
This scenario is the one that puts a halt to the printing press when talking about the death of paper, declining readership and consequential financing. Everything is about finding the charm of print journalism, its distinctive appearance before the bombing of the instantaneous. In this regard, Tomas Eloy Martinez struggled to make this an art trade, the search for beauty in the story without sacrificing rigor in information, ie ask for more flight to the ink and not enough automation. Then, as readers do we look at the weight on the agenda or the quality of the texts?